Comments on: PageRank http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/ Advocating User-Centered URL Design Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:01:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Phill http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-149480 Phill Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:01:23 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-149480 A very old post, but very very good read! I love your theory here, particularly the 3 P's of page rank. cheers Phil A very old post, but very very good read! I love your theory here, particularly the 3 P’s of page rank.

cheers

Phil

]]> By: Floyd Nenninger http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-137151 Floyd Nenninger Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:19:47 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-137151 There is a heavy and mixed emotions about the theory of Giggle deleting a web-site if your caught. However, if your cautious and are making sure that your SEO Company is supplying rss linking capabilities to the purchase. Then, to buy backlinks becomes probably a very savvy SEO technique you can count on. There is a heavy and mixed emotions about the theory of Giggle deleting a web-site if your caught. However, if your cautious and are making sure that your SEO Company is supplying rss linking capabilities to the purchase. Then, to buy backlinks becomes probably a very savvy SEO technique you can count on.

]]> By: Iksanika Software Company http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-19546 Iksanika Software Company Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:51:23 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-19546 Very nice thread, Looks like it takes whole life to get PR7. I will not even talk about PR8+ The thing is even if you know the scale of PR is calculated - you can try fool arounf the SE's, but one day they will find you - and you will be done! So as I believe, the best way is the longest way, it is much safer and better to grow gradually, than the next update get the "desired" PR and after that in the following update enjoy no traffic at all.... Best of luck! Very nice thread,

Looks like it takes whole life to get PR7. I will not even talk about PR8+

The thing is even if you know the scale of PR is calculated – you can try fool arounf the SE’s, but one day they will find you – and you will be done!

So as I believe, the best way is the longest way, it is much safer and better to grow gradually, than the next update get the “desired” PR and after that in the following update enjoy no traffic at all….

Best of luck!

]]> By: Mike Schinkel http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-18658 Mike Schinkel Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:53:43 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-18658 @Jay Freeman: Doh! You caught me and have got a great point. Frankly if memory serves it was a typo that I meant to go to the wiki not to the blog. And yes, I create links to the wiki that I don't always fill out later, but the URLs are still well designed. :) I'll fix it up. @Jay Freeman: Doh! You caught me and have got a great point. Frankly if memory serves it was a typo that I meant to go to the wiki not to the blog. And yes, I create links to the wiki that I don’t always fill out later, but the URLs are still well designed. :)

I’ll fix it up.

]]> By: Jay Freeman (saurik) http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-18593 Jay Freeman (saurik) Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:08:26 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-18593 The URL http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/url-literacy/, which I'm certain was incredibly well designed, is currently a 404. Maybe it always was, and linking it from this blog post was a mistake of some sort. Either way, I'd love to understand what went wrong with this URL and how it fits into the philosophy you advance on your site. The URL http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/url-literacy/, which I’m certain was incredibly well designed, is currently a 404. Maybe it always was, and linking it from this blog post was a mistake of some sort. Either way, I’d love to understand what went wrong with this URL and how it fits into the philosophy you advance on your site.

]]> By: Mike Schinkel http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-11118 Mike Schinkel Mon, 28 May 2007 04:00:03 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-11118 @beevers99: I wish I knew. I think it is still pretty important, but you'd have to ask others who follow it more closely than I to get a better answer. @beevers99: I wish I knew. I think it is still pretty important, but you’d have to ask others who follow it more closely than I to get a better answer.

]]> By: beevers99@yahoo.com http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-11103 beevers99@yahoo.com Mon, 28 May 2007 00:29:50 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-11103 How much weight do you think google currently puts towards the anchor text to a link now? Do you think it holds some mulliplier to overall PR value? How much weight do you think google currently puts towards the anchor text to a link now? Do you think it holds some mulliplier to overall PR value?

]]> By: Cape Cod SEO - Maintaining the Sex Appeal of Your Web Addresses http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-3825 Cape Cod SEO - Maintaining the Sex Appeal of Your Web Addresses Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:24:54 +0000 http://blog.welldesignedurls.org/2007/02/26/pagerank/#comment-3825 [...] SEO: Illuminating the Value of URL Design [...] [...] SEO: Illuminating the Value of URL Design [...]

]]>